In that case, why don't I revert my changes and let you remove the
references after j.u.l is removed.
-- Kevin
On 5/21/2018 2:13 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
Since the packager is being removed I don't see a reason to keep any
references to it. In any case, the Eclipse files are planned to be
updated [1] after j.u.l. is removed [2].
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-April/021740.html
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195974
- Nir
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Phil or Ajit,
Please review the following simple fix:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203378
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203378>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8203378/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekcr/8203378/webrev.00/>
This removes one qualified export from javafx.graphics to the
no-longer-built jdk.packager module. More details in JBS.
Note to Eclipse users: This patch modifies the Eclipse files to
remove references to jdk.packager. I would like a read from the
users of Eclipse as to whether I should do this or not. I am
equally happy to commit or revert my changes to these files.
-- Kevin
