Hi, Johan asked me to move the empty jar discussion to the mailing list. As I mentioned at GitHub, we did some tests with the published SNAPSHOT's and we had to force an exclude of the empty jars at the dependecies. Otherwise e.g. Eclipse shows a warning that the module name is instable because of the "auto-generated" module name in case of the empty jars.
Thanks at Joeri for explaining the reason. I understand now the reason for the empty jar. https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/83#issuecomment-404828804 I never tried it and I know that it doesn't fit to the familar handling of platform dependent jars... Have you thought about it to use the platform variable at the artifactId? Something like: <artifactId>javafx-controls-${javafx.platform}</artifactId> Best Regards, Steve
