Hi, Currently , I used javafx 8 with JNLP Application.
Is JNLP application support in javafx11 + java11 ? Any idea about auto update application in win(exe),mac,linux base application ? On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM Lennart Börjeson <lenbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was migrated, but removed... > > The recommended work-around is to use the javapackager in OracleJDK 10 > when packing Java/OpenJfx 11 applications. > > That may or may not be practical depending on your build setup. Also, if > you’re currently using the UserJvmOptions services, these are also gone in > Java/OpenJfx 11, and it would complicate the build process even further if > you were required to separate the parts needing to compile with OracleJDK > 10, too. > > I’m using Gradle to build my project, and it is currently dependent on the > javafx-Gradle-plugin to package. To upgrade to Java/OpenJfx 11, and still > keep the javapackager, I would need to refactor: > > 1) my code base, to separate the parts needed to compile with OracleJDK 10 > to get the UserJvmOptions, > 2) my Gradle structure, to run in three steps (compile some parts with 10, > compile most parts with 11, package all with 10 while still linking most > from 11). > > It’s too much for me. I’ve decided to remain at Java 10 and wait until > there’s a javapackager replacement. The javafx-Gradle-plugin has also been > deprecated due to the loss of the javapackager, so I’m stuck anyway with > Java 10 unless I rework my entire build structure substantially. I’m hoping > for a future Gradle plugin replacement. > > Seriously, it would be much easier to build my own JDK with OpenJfx, the > javapackager and UserJvmOptions Service still bundled with it, but then I’d > step up to a completely different level of support commitment... > > /Lennart Börjeson > Epistula electronica a meo computatro tabulari missa est > > > 18 sep. 2018 kl. 22:37 skrev Tom Golden <tgol...@andplus.com>: > > > > I understand that along with JavaFX being removed from the Oracle JDK > > distribution in Java 11, the Oracle team will no longer release the > > `javapackager` tool. > > > > I also see there is a JEP discussing an eventual replacement, JEP-343 ( > > http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/343). > > > > Just to confirm, the tool was NOT migrated to OpenJFX with the rest of > the > > JavaFX code, correct? So until JEP-343 is implemented in a future release > > (?) there is no "official" way to package native installers for JavaFX > > applications? > > > > If so, is it in theory still possible to use the Oracle javapackager tool > > from earlier releases? Or should we remain on Java 10 for the time being? > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Tom Golden > > Technical Architect > > AndPlus, LLC > > 257 Turnpike Road > > Southborough, MA 01772 > > > > Phone 508-425-7533 > > http://www.andplus.com > -- Thanks With Regards, Kamlesh Prajapati
