Hi Johan Been using the gluon packager successfully on windows and macOS, awaiting the release of the JEP343 (I think) one - thank you (from me and my user base)!
I just had to renew my Apple developer cert that’s used for signing and discover that Apple have changed the CN in the developer cert from “Developer ID Application:” to “Mac Developer:”. Checking https://github.com/johanvos/openjdk-mobile11/blob/packager/src/jdk.packager/macosx/classes/jdk/packager/internal/mac/MacAppBundler.java <https://github.com/johanvos/openjdk-mobile11/blob/packager/src/jdk.packager/macosx/classes/jdk/packager/internal/mac/MacAppBundler.java> I see the CN prefix is hard-coded, so my options appear to be fork, edit rebuild. Anyone aware of any other options, or is now the time to switch to the early access jpackage plse? Thanks Alan > On 19 Dec 2018, at 18:10, Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> wrote: > > The packager that works with Java 11 and JavaFX 11 is at > > http://download2.gluonhq.com/jpackager/11/jdk.packager-linux.ziphttp://download2.gluonhq.com/jpackager/11/jdk.packager-osx.ziphttp://download2.gluonhq.com/jpackager/11/jdk.packager-windows.zip > > (see > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-September/022500.html > ). > > However, I highly recommend testing the early access version of jpackage. > That is the way forward for the packager. > > - Johan > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:36 PM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> I doubt that will work. >> >> We are developing a replacement tool, jpackage [1], which will be part >> of OpenJDK. It is planned for JDK 13, and will support JDK 11 or later >> as a Java runtime. You can download an early access of this tool on >> jdk.java.net [2]. Discussion on jpackage is happening on the >> core-libs-dev mailing list [3]. Alternatively, Gluon has a standalone >> version of javapackager that will work with JDK 11. Johan Vos can >> provide a pointer. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/343 >> [2] http://jdk.java.net/jpackage/ >> [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/core-libs-dev >> >> On 12/19/2018 5:28 AM, Alan White (Drum Score Editor) wrote: >>> I understand the guidance for apps created with OpenJDK 11, is to use >> the javapackager from jdk 10. >>> >>> The old basedir parameter that could be used to direct the packager to >> use a specific runtime is no longer present. >>> >>> Is there any mechanism I’ve missed in order to have the packager from >> jdk10 bundle the 11 runtime plse? >>> >>> Thanks >> >>