On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:43:43 GMT, Dell Green 
<12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:02:22 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:59:52 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:58:43 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:41:40 GMT, Johan Vos <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 19:58:20 GMT, Dell Green 
>>>>> <12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:42:21 GMT, Kenzie Togami 
>>>>>> <2093023+kenziero...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:30:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:35:51 GMT, Dell Green 
>>>>>>>> <12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> buildSrc/crosslibs-armv6hf.sh pulls down debian and raspbian packages 
>>>>>>>>> to be able to cross compile javafx for arm hard float. Up to now the 
>>>>>>>>> upstream distribution versions have been debian and raspbian wheezy, 
>>>>>>>>> but these are now end of life and have been archived to servers that 
>>>>>>>>> have different domain names.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Tried to change to use jessie but this generates a whole load of  
>>>>>>>>> __THROWNL errors, so for now have updated the domain names to point 
>>>>>>>>> to new servers so that wheezy packages can still be retrieved and 
>>>>>>>>> cross compilation succeeds.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8231870
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ----------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Commits:
>>>>>>>>>  - bb4bcc9e: 8231870: Updated armv6hf crosslibs script with new 
>>>>>>>>> resource domain names for wheezy
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/8/files
>>>>>>>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/8/webrev.00
>>>>>>>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231870
>>>>>>>>>   Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
>>>>>>>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/8.diff
>>>>>>>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/8/head:pull/8
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> buildSrc/crosslibs/crosslibs-armv6hf.sh line 232:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 231:         http://archive.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main armhf \
>>>>>>>>> 232:             libatk1.0-dev \
>>>>>>>>> 233:             libatk1.0-0 \
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The use of `http://` URLs to download artifacts is strongly 
>>>>>>>> discouraged, since it isn't secure. Is there a valid `https://` URL 
>>>>>>>> that can be used instead? I note that just substituting `http` with 
>>>>>>>> `https` in the above URL does not work.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> buildSrc/crosslibs/crosslibs-armv6hf.sh line 392:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 391:         $DESTINATION \
>>>>>>>>> 392:         http://legacy.raspbian.org/raspbian wheezy firmware 
>>>>>>>>> armhf \
>>>>>>>>> 393:         libraspberrypi-dev
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Same comment hear about using an `https` URL if possible.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I don't have any particular issue with this change. It does highlight 
>>>>>>>> an existing problem where we are still using an `http` URL rather than 
>>>>>>>> `https`. That may or may not be something we can solve here.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In general a lot of Debian package URLs are not HTTPS by default 
>>>>>>> because of apt's built-in signature checking, 
>>>>>>> https://whydoesaptnotusehttps.com/. However, it does seem like it 
>>>>>>> should at least be supported, so it might be a bug in the `debian.org` 
>>>>>>> server config.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Additionally, I see that the `getPackages` command doesn't check these 
>>>>>>> signatures. It probably should, but that's another PR.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https for legacy.raspbian.org works
>>>>> 
>>>>> I confirm that without the patch, the "cross-build tools" can not be 
>>>>> fetched. With this patch, the tools can be fetched and the build can be 
>>>>> created using these tools.
>>>>> I think this PR is good as it is, as it fixes something that was broken.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, in general I think the concept of this crosslibs script is 
>>>>> broken for a number of reasons:
>>>>> 1. for none of the other targets, we have a script for downloading the 
>>>>> toolchain. 
>>>>> 2. we have one big blob toolchain for all ARM devices, and do not take 
>>>>> advantage of new compilers/libraries/CPU's. Maintaining toolchains 
>>>>> requires work, and I think it is better that the OpenJFX repository 
>>>>> focuses on the source code, not on the build context.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rethinking the concept of cross-compiliation involves much more than just 
>>>>> downloading a cross-compiler and libs, and we should not fix that in a 
>>>>> rush.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I therefore propose to merge this PR.
>>>> 
>>>> I am going to temporarily change the title in an attempt to force the 
>>>> jcheck bot to run again. I'll change it back once done. Failing this, I 
>>>> will ask the Skara admins to rerun the check if possible. If this doesn't 
>>>> work, we will need to close this PR and have you open a new one.
>>> 
>>> Looks like that worked and reran jcheck.
>> 
>> Please ignore the above comments. I added them to the wrong PR.
>> 
>> This PR was and still is ready for review.
> 
> I'll suspend testing of the https domains as previously mentioned.

@dellgreen once you are ready, go ahead and issue the `/integrate` command. 
Presuming that @johanvos will sponsor this, he can then issue the `/sponsor` 
command after double-checking the commit message, etc.

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/8

Reply via email to