On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:28:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:28:30 GMT, mruzicka 
> <github.com+562920+mruzi...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:28:28 GMT, mruzicka 
>> <github.com+562920+mruzi...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Secondary event loop introduced as a means of synchronization with the 
>>> JavaFX Application thread in [1] never terminates as the 
>>> SecondaryLoop.exit() call is not reached because the thread is blocked in 
>>> the SecondaryLoop.enter() call.
>>> This patch fixes the problem by submitting the UI work (including the call 
>>> to the SecondaryLoop.exit() method) before entering the secondary loop.
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/7cf2dfa0b3c5bfd0f1a2de36d46b62f7e9e256c4
>>> 
>>> ----------------
>>> 
>>> Commits:
>>>  - 9483ccde: 8231372: Correctly terminate secondary event loop in 
>>> JFXPanel.setScene()
>>> 
>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/16/files
>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/16/webrev.00
>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231372
>>>   Stats: 6 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 2 del; 3 mod
>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/16.diff
>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/16/head:pull/16
>> 
>> @kevinrushforth I believe you should be able to move forward with the review 
>> of this PR now as I've filed a bug report for the problem and signed the OCA 
>> as required. (As I did not know I needed to have my github account 
>> associated with the OCA, I did not include it in my details. I've asked 
>> Dalibor Topic from the Java SE PM team to help me have that fixed or get in 
>> touch with you to confirm my signing of the OCA.)
> 
> @mruzicka once Dalibor connects your OCA with your GitHub account, this 
> review will be able to proceed.

Do you have a test program that shows the bug?

Also, can you take a look at whether you could turn the test case into an 
automated test?

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/16

Reply via email to