On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 06:09:35 GMT, Dell Green 
<github.com+12861109+dellgr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:32:31 GMT, John Neffenger 
> <github.com+1413266+jgn...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 22:04:36 GMT, Dell Green 
>> <github.com+12861109+dellgr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:34:06 GMT, John Neffenger 
>>> <github.com+1413266+jgn...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:03:42 GMT, Dell Green 
>>>> <12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Often on embedded systems a cursor is not a valid input modality. On some 
>>>>> of these systems, when the javafx toolkit initialises the native hardware 
>>>>> cursor, it produces artefacts which can be seen on screen (in the 
>>>>> framebuffer for example). This change adds a system property 
>>>>> "monocle.cursor.enabled" that can disable the creation of a native cursor 
>>>>> in each of the Monocle NativePlatform implementations in favour of a 
>>>>> NullCursor which is a no-op implementation of the NativeCursor abstract 
>>>>> class that all native cursors have to implement.
>>>>> 
>>>>> NullCursor class already existed and was being returned for some 
>>>>> implementations like AndroidPlatform and HeadlessPlatform. This change 
>>>>> builds upon that and conditionally returns NullCursor for all platforms.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A system property "monocle.debugcursor" has also been added to turn on 
>>>>> logging of which NativeCursor has been selected when the toolkit 
>>>>> initialises.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Commits:
>>>>>  - cfbbc7dd: JDK-8087980: Add property to disable Monocle cursor
>>>>> 
>>>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/5/files
>>>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/5/webrev.00
>>>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087980
>>>>>   Stats: 49 lines in 8 files changed: 40 ins; 0 del; 9 mod
>>>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/5.diff
>>>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/5/head:pull/5
>>>> 
>>>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/ui/monocle/NativePlatform.java
>>>>  line 50:
>>>> 
>>>>> 49:         AccessController.doPrivileged((PrivilegedAction<Boolean>) () 
>>>>> -> {
>>>>> 50:             final String str =
>>>>> 51:                 System.getProperty("monocle.debugcursor", "");
>>>> 
>>>> Just a nit, but why `monocle.debugcursor` rather than 
>>>> `monocle.cursor.debug` (my preference), or at least `monocle.debugCursor`? 
>>>> Below is the full list, for comparison, including the two added by this 
>>>> pull request.
>>>> 
>>>> monocle.cursor.enabled
>>>> monocle.debugcursor
>>>> monocle.epd.bitsPerPixel
>>>> monocle.epd.enableInversion
>>>> monocle.epd.forceMonochrome
>>>> monocle.epd.noWait
>>>> monocle.epd.rotate
>>>> monocle.epd.useDitheringY1
>>>> monocle.epd.useDitheringY4
>>>> monocle.epd.waveformMode
>>>> monocle.epd.y8inverted
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.flipXY
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.maxX
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.maxY
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.minX
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.minY
>>>> monocle.input.<product>.touchFilters
>>>> monocle.input.touchFilters
>>>> monocle.input.touchRadius
>>>> monocle.input.traceEvents
>>>> monocle.input.traceEvents.verbose
>>>> monocle.maliSignedStruct
>>>> monocle.platform
>>>> monocle.platform.traceConfig
>>>> monocle.screen.fb
>>>> monocle.stackSize
>>>> 
>>>> I'm nervous about our hidden API of system properties, and I'm as guilty 
>>>> as anyone with the nine properties I added for Monocle EPD. I think it 
>>>> might be okay as long as the code gets the property values only during 
>>>> class initialization. That should restrict their use to startup scripts 
>>>> and keep them out of application code trying to modify them *on-the-fly* 
>>>> at run time.
>>> 
>>> if i recall i originally started with the format you recommend as it made 
>>> more sense, and when looking for other debug logging across the javafx 
>>> stack I picked up on somewhat of a loose existing convention so changed to 
>>> match it. I guess it can be whatever everyone agrees upon. :)
>> 
>> On second thought, let's remove `monocle.debugcursor` and use a 
>> [PlatformLogger](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/logging/PlatformLogger.java).
>>  The JavaFX loggers are available from 
>> [Logging](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/util/Logging.java).
>>  In retrospect, that's how I managed to avoid any new *debug* properties for 
>> Monocle EPD even though it's packed with debugging and trace messages. For 
>> examples, see the variable `logger` in 
>> [EPDFrameBuffer](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/ui/monocle/EPDFrameBuffer.java),
>>  where `logger.fine` is called for messages printed once per run, while 
>> `logger.finer` is called for messages printed once per rendered frame.
> 
> OK, that looks a better way to go. I'll sort out out an additional pull 
> request when back in work Monday. Off the top of your head can you remember 
> the syntax to change the logger level from command line when starting the JVM?

> Off the top of your head can you remember the syntax to change the logger 
> level from command line when starting the JVM?

Here's how I use it. My Bash run script is **bin/run.sh**:

#!/bin/bash
# Runs the EPD JavaFX Animator program
JAVA_HOME=$HOME/opt/jdk-13.0.1+9
JAVAFX_LIB=$HOME/lib/armv6hf-sdk/lib

app_dir=$HOME/src/epd-javafx
app_jar=$app_dir/dist/epd-javafx.jar
logging=$app_dir/conf/logging.properties

$JAVA_HOME/bin/java -Djava.util.logging.config.file=$logging \
    --add-modules=javafx.graphics --module-path=$JAVAFX_LIB \
    -Dglass.platform=Monocle -Dmonocle.platform=EPD -Dprism.order=sw \
    -Dmonocle.input.18/0/0/0.maxX=800 -Dmonocle.input.18/0/0/0.maxY=600 \
    -Dmonocle.epd.waveformMode=4 -jar $app_jar $@

The logging properties are defined in **conf/logging.properties**:

 Properties
# Global properties
handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
.level = INFO

# Handler specific properties
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = ALL
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter.format=%4$s: %5$s%n

# Facility specific properties
javafx.level = FINE

The output looks like the following:

$ sudo bin/run.sh --pattern=3 --loops=0
FINE: EPD system properties: {monocle.epd.waveformMode=4}
FINE: Frame buffer geometry: 800 600 800 640 32
FINE: Frame buffer rgba: 8/16,8/8,8/0,8/24
FINE: Frame buffer grayscale: 0
FINE: Mapping frame buffer: 1,920,000 bytes
Frame rate: 80 frames in 11.93 s =  6.70 fps (149 ms/frame)
Frame rate: 80 frames in  9.97 s =  8.03 fps (125 ms/frame)
Frame rate: 80 frames in  9.96 s =  8.03 fps (125 ms/frame)

You can just add a new commit to this pull request branch. (I think that's what 
you meant, but just in case.) The commits get *squashed* into a single commit 
when they are integrated into the target branch.

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/5

Reply via email to