On 24.01.2020 16:26, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > Thank you for filing this enhancement request. As an enhancement it should be > discussed on this > list before proceeding with a pull request (although a "WIP" or Draft PR can > be used to illustrate > the concept). Sure, will do after creating an appropriate PR for adding the ARGV and FILENAME entries to the engine scope bindings [1] (may take a little while). > For my part, this seems like a reasonable enhancement, as long as there are > no compatibility > issues, but it would be good to hear from application developers who heavily > use FXML.
+1 ---rony [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234959 > > > On 1/24/2020 7:21 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> Just filed a RFE with the following information: >> >> * Component: >> o JavaFX >> >> * Subcomponent: >> o fxml: JavaFX FXML >> >> * Synopsis: >> o "FXMLLoader: if script engines implement javax.script.Compilabel >> compile scripts" >> >> * Descriptions: >> o "FXMLLoader is able to execute scripts in Java script languages >> (javax.script.ScriptEngine >> implementations) if such a Java script language gets defined as the >> controller language in >> the FXML file. >> >> If a script engine implements the javax.script.Compilable >> interface, then such scripts >> could >> be compiled and the resulting javax.script.CompiledScript could be >> executed instead using >> its eval() methods. >> >> Evaluating the CompiledScript objects may help speed up the >> execution of script >> invocations, >> especially for scripts defined for event attributes in FXML >> elements (e.g. like >> onMouseMove) >> which may be repetitevly invoked and evaluated." >> >> * System /OS/Java Runtime Information: >> o "All systems." >> >> Received the internal review ID: "9063426" >> >> ---rony
