OK. FWIW, proper headless support, along the lines of AWT's headless
mode, would be a very useful enhancement to JavaFX. I suspect that
Monocle, at least in its current form, is not entirely suitable, at
least not without some refactoring.
-- Kevin
On 2/18/2020 3:54 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
Thanks. I'm working with Gluon (commercially) to see if changing that
moving forward is possible, I'll focus my energy over there.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 6:49 PM Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
For desktop platforms, Monocle is only used as a testing
framework. It
isn't really suitable for proper headless support (as I guess you
noticed), and isn't shipped on desktop platforms with the release.
-- Kevin
On 2/17/2020 11:12 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the developer of a printing plugin which leverages JavaFX
for a few
> HTML functions.
>
> One of our functions would greatly benefit from being "headless
(or more
> accurately, "silent") mode that Monocle offers and I'm
evaluating the use
> of Monocle on (non-headless) Desktops for this. I'm currently
testing a
> monocle build by the TestFX team for MacOS.
>
> Although first test was positive, when invoking multiple times,
I'm getting
> some internal errors similar to this:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49388497
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49388497__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OkhvN-Rp5EfghdDRusLSOCh7vM4YR1ApYTCj8vEcCLGNOQ5D0hh4Q31drVSRz6jUiLte$>
and the framework grows slower
> and slower as it nears its final capture. (I'm using
WebView.capture(...))
>
> Is this the right place for such as discussion? Where's the best
place to
> ask about issues with Monocle?
>
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com <mailto:tres.finocchi...@gmail.com>
