On Fri, 8 May 2020 18:50:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I wasn't aware of PR #73, I only saw the (very old) issue in the JDK Bug >> System and started to look into the issue. >> The fact that two different people start to look into the same issue shows >> it is important however :-). >> Should I close this PR and participate in PR #73? > > @effad I just closed PR #73 due to inactivity. If you are interested > interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen > this (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is > insufficient). We're in the process of finishing our products' release. If I find time I will try and give this (rather nasty) Problem another shot. On 2020-05-08 20:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > > @effad <https://github.com/effad> I just closed PR #73 > <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/73> due to inactivity. If you are > interested interested in pursuing this, go ahead and reopen this > (although you would need to address the feedback that clamping is > insufficient). > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/138#issuecomment-625963496>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCKAQ6JRLHJSGPI3U2YTNLRQRIB7ANCNFSM4LCNBSIA>. > ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/138
