On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:38:45 GMT, Ambarish Rapte <ara...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Issue:
>> In TreeTableView, in case of Multiple selection mode, if nested items are
>> selected, then TreeTableView does not
>> retain/update the selection correctly when the tree items are
>> permuted(either by `sort()` or by reordering using
>> `setAll()`). Cause:
>>
>> 1. For permutation, the current implementation uses `TreeModificationEvent`
>> to update the selection.
>> 2. The indices from these TreeModificationEvents are not reliable.
>> 3. It uses the non public `TreeTablePosition` constructor to create
>> intermediate `TreeItem` positions, this constructor
>> results in another unexpected TreeModificationEvent while one for sorting is
>> already being processed. 4. In case of
>> sorting, there can be multiple intermediate TreeModificationEvents
>> generated, and for each TreeModificationEvent, the
>> selection gets updated and results in selection change events being
>> generated. 5. Each time a TreeItem is expanded or
>> collapsed, the selection must be shifted, but shifting is not necessary in
>> case of permutation. All these issues
>> combine in wrong update of the selection. Fix:
>>
>> 1. On each TreeModificationEvent for permutation, for updating the
>> selection, use index of TreeItem from the
>> TreeTableView but not from the TreeModificationEvent. 2. Added a new non
>> public TreeTablePosition constructor, which is
>> almost a copy constructor but accepts a different row. 3. In case of
>> sorting, send out the set of selection change
>> events only once after the sorting is over. 4. In case of setAll, send out
>> the set of selection change events same as
>> before.(setAll results in only one TreeModificationEvent, which effectively
>> results in only one set of selection change
>> events). `shiftSelection()` should not be called in case of permutation i.e.
>> call `if (shift != 0)`
>> Verification:
>> The change is very limited to updating of selection of TreeTableView items
>> when the TreeItems are permuted, so the
>> change should not cause any other failures. Added unit tests which fail
>> before and pass after the fix.
>
> Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove the un-required flag
modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/TreeTablePosition.java
line 79:
> 78: }
> 79:
> 80: // Copy-like constructor with a different row.
Suggest to add
// Not public API
before this description.
(Similar to the constructor above this newly added constructor)
modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/TreeTableView.java
line 1856:
> 1855: Callback<TreeTableView<S>, Boolean> sortPolicy =
> getSortPolicy();
> 1856: if (sortPolicy == null) return;
> 1857: Boolean success = sortPolicy.call(this);
Do we need to set sortingInProgress to false before returning from here?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/244
