On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:14:48 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> So I'd like to propose this third alternative, which would affect only >>> VirtualFlow and the controls that use it, but >>> wouldn't have any impact in the rest of controls as the other two options >>> (as ExpressionHelper or Node listeners >>> wouldn't be modified). >> >> Given PR #185, which was mentioned above, (it isn't out for review yet, but >> I want to evaluate it), this would be a 4th >> approach. >> As long as this really doesn't introduce a leak, it seems promising. >> >> I note that these are not mutually exclusive. >> >> We should discuss this on the list and not just in one or more of of the 3 >> (soon to be 4) open pull requests. > > @dannygonzalez Per [this > message](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2020-September/027534.html) > on > the openjfx-dev mailing list, I have filed a new JBS issue for this PR to > use. Please change the title to: > 8252936: Optimize removal of listeners from ExpressionHelper.Generic Thanks @kevinrushforth, I've changed the title. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/108
