On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 15:21:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I will keep testing it, but I think it's looking good. > > I see a lot of work going into this. > > In order for this to progress beyond the prototype or concept phase, we will > need to have a discussion on the openjfx-dev mailing list in a separate email > thread that is not directly tied to the PR -- meaning not a reply to the RFR > thread and not a comment in the PR. > > @tsayao When you are ready, please send a short email (not a reply to any > existing message) to openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net with the following: > > 1. A short summary of the proposed enhancement > 2. The goals of the proposed enhancement > 3. A description of the proposed changes (basically, the bullet items from > the description of this PR) > 4. A pointer to this PR for reference > > I want to focus the openjfx-dev discussion on getting general agreement on > the overall approach rather than on the details of the code changes. This is > a big change, so getting feedback on the overall goals and approach is > important; review comments in the PR aren't the best way to have that > discussion. > > We aren't following the formal JEP process for JavaFX features, but the JEP > template in [JEP 2](https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/2) is a good format to > follow for large or high-impact features to make sure that the motivation, > goals, and tradeoffs are documented. > > Finally, I note that this will eventually need a CSR, but that can be done > once there is agreement on the approach, and when this is farther along in > the review process. @kevinrushforth Ok, will do as the instructions. Thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/77
