On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 14:50:08 GMT, Frederic Thevenet <ftheve...@openjdk.org>
wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/ui/Application.java line
>> 764:
>>
>>> 762: default:
>>> 763: return Optional.empty();
>>> 764: }
>>
>> This could be a switch expression:
>> return switch (lockState) {
>> case KeyEvent.KEY_LOCK_OFF -> Optional.of(false);
>> case KeyEvent.KEY_LOCK_ON -> Optional.of(true);
>> default -> Optional.empty();
>> }
>> Also, do we use a space after `switch`? I see many instances both with and
>> without in the current source.
>
> Do we plan to drop support for JDK11 for OpenJFX 17? If not, we'll need to
> keep to the classic Switch statement, as Switch expressions were only
> introduced in JDK12 or 13 as a preview.
> That said, since 17 is going to be the next LTS release, maybe the plan is to
> bump the dependency for OpenJFX then?
Totally selfish request: It would be great if OpenJFX 17 would retain
compatibilty with JDK 11 -- NetBeans allows including JavaFX and will retain
JDK 11 compatibility for the foreseable future. I can understand, that at some
point, language features will become too important to retain compatibility, but
this looks dubious to me.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/385
