On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:20:36 GMT, mstr2 <github.com+43553916+ms...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> It does seems like there is a possible inconsistency for `TreeCell` and >> `TreeTableRow`. I'm not sure it matters in practice, since an application >> doesn't directly manage the creation of the cells (other than by providing a >> cell factory) or setting the item. The pseudo-class state of the cell is a >> proxy for the item it points to. Ideally, it would only contain the "empty" >> state if the item is null, but given that such a cell would never be >> rendered it would be hard to point to something that doesn't work as a >> result. >> >> In any case, since there are larger issues than just setting the default >> state for `TreeCell` and `TreeTableRow` I'd prefer to decouple them from >> this issue and file a follow-up issue (which doesn't need to be looked at >> any time soon). > > I've reverted the changes to `TreeCell` and `TreeTableRow`. Thanks. I filed [JDK-8263096](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8263096) to track the follow-issue for `TreeCell` and `TreeTableRow`. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/413
