On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 20:20:41 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> In the `TreeTableCell` class there is a mismatch between name of the >> following property method vs the getter: >> >> >> public final ReadOnlyObjectProperty<TreeTableRow<S>> tableRowProperty() >> public final TreeTableRow<S> getTreeTableRow() >> >> >> The get method has "Tree" in the name while the property method does not. >> >> By contrast, the corresponding methods for column are self-consistent, and >> are named without "Tree" in the name: >> >> >> public final ReadOnlyObjectProperty<TreeTableColumn<S,T>> >> tableColumnProperty() >> public final TreeTableColumn<S,T> getTableColumn() >> >> >> The solution is to effectively change `getTreeTableRow()` to >> `getTableRow()`. In order to preserve source and binary compatibility, the >> method is copied rather than renamed. The existing `getTreeTableRow()` >> method is deprecated (not for removal). >> >> Additionally, the docs for each property is on a private property field that >> *does* have tree in the name, which results in no docs being generated for >> either the `tableRow` or `tableColumn` property. >> >> Finally, there is a problem with the implementation of the >> `tableRowProperty()` method in that it returns the writable property by >> mistake rather than the read-only property that is specified by the method's >> return type. >> >> In summary, the following changes are made to `TreeTableCell`: >> >> 1. Deprecate the `getTreeTableRow` method. >> 2. Add a `getTableRow` method. >> 3. Rename the (private) property object fields from `treeTableRow` and >> `treeTableColumn` to `tableRow` and `tableColumn`, including the name of the >> bean, so that they match the public property method names. This will allow >> API docs to be generated. >> 4. Change the implementation of the tableRowProperty() method to return a >> read-only property. >> >> In addition to changing the existing implementation and tests to call the >> new `getTableRow` method instead of the now-deprecated `getTreeTableRow` >> method, I added unit tests to validate changes 3 and 4. >> >> NOTE: this is targeted to `jfx17`. > > Kevin Rushforth has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Fix typo in javadoc comment Marked as reviewed by aghaisas (Reviewer). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/575