On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:34:32 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR adds missing copyright header blocks for several properties files, > script files, and textual data files (e.g., fxml, css) that do not have them. > Where feasible, all non-trivial textual files in the repo should have a > proper copyright header. > > ## Notes to Reviewers > > * This PR is targeted to the `jfx17` branch. > * There are two commits that can be reviewed separately, if you prefer. The > first covers most of the files, and adds a copyright header with a GPL v2 + > classpath license. The second is for the `apps/samples` only, which adds a > copyright header with a BSD-style license. Is there a reason why the samples have a BSD license while the others have GPL + CPE? (not that I'm against BSD, just wondering) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/591
