On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:06:12 GMT, yosbits <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> The reason I think the Null Safe explanation is incorrect is because In the > interest of fairness, I feel it would be better to have an example of using > the Optional API when comparing the existing way of writing to the new way of > writing PR. No problem, I've added it -- I really wasn't attempting to make it look worse than it is, that's just how I would have written it I guess. They're also not going to be part of the documentation, just something I wrote up to introduce the PR. I sometimes do the trick with `Optional.ofNullable` as well. > I am not denying that PR's new code is simpler and easier to read. :) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/675
