On Wed, 25 May 2022 07:37:38 GMT, Laurent Bourgès <lbour...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> keep dpqs for corner cases and keep my coding life simple I think this approach is fine. Diverging the code would likely make it less stable, and you answered the question about the provenance of the code, so there's no issue there. We should try to get this in before RDP1 of JavaFX 19 if possible. One more thing, as I wrote in my above comment: > We should file a new JBS Enhancement issue -- similar to what was done for > Marlin 0.9.2 via > [JDK-8204621](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204621) rather than > using a narrow bug, since that bug is only part of what's being done. The > current bug can either be added to the PR, or else that JBS bug (JDK-8274066) > can be closed as a duplicate of the new Enhancement. I took the liberty of filing [JDK-8287604](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8287604) for this enhancement. Can you change the title to: 8287604: Update MarlinFX to 0.9.4.5 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/674
