On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 22:15:46 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> That would be equivalent yes. >> >> Perhaps it is because `timePassed` was a `double` before measured in seconds >> while I'm now doing the calculation with nano seconds? > > Okay I see what you're getting at, your first suggestion would not be > correct, it's supposed to be what you suggest in the 2nd one. So what I want > is: > > (scrollMagnitude / nanosPassed) * NANOS_TO_SECONDS > > or: > > (scrollMagnitude * NANOS_TO_SECONDS) / nanosPassed > > ...but that's the same as what I wrote. I just needed you to confirm that this is indeed correct. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/966
