On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 09:17:33 GMT, Karthik P K <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think it is also pretty clear the original author intended to check >> `rows.length == 0` and made the mistake that it would be called with `rows >> == null` when there are no further indices specified, which is incorrect. > > I believe no code change is required as of now. Hence not making any changes > now. I also think that `null` should throw unless otherwise specified. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1018
