On Thu, 11 May 2023 19:12:52 GMT, Marius Hanl <mh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I think I now understand the snapping better, especially after discussion in >> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1111 >> >> it looks like we should be operating in terms of final pixels, that is, in >> snapped coordinates. this might mean what we should not, generally, mix >> snapped and unsnapped values: >> >> result = snap(a) + snap(b); // ok >> >> result = snap(snap(a) + b) // also ok >> >> result = snap(snap(a) + b + c) // not ok, should be written as >> result = snap(snap(a) + snap(b) + snap(c)) or >> result = snap(a) + snap(b) + snap(c) >> >> What do you think? > > I agree but that is also what I do here, isn't it? here: yes! ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/910#discussion_r1191632124
