Michael: Thank you for clarifications! So, are these new properties really required to fix https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313956, or it can be fixed by improving event handling?
-andy From: openjfx-dev <openjfx-dev-r...@openjdk.org> on behalf of Michael Strauß <michaelstr...@gmail.com> Date: Friday, August 18, 2023 at 10:19 To: Cc: openjfx-dev <openjfx-dev@openjdk.org> Subject: Re: Focused nodes and focus owners The added properties and pseudo-classes would basically complete the representation of focus-related states of JavaFX nodes. But I don't think it's something an application can't implement in other ways. What prompted this idea is the discussion in PR 1210 [0], where the behavior of the reproducer program could be preceived as unintuitive: The table retains the `focus-within` flag, even though it is not the focus owner of the application. The addition of `focus-owner-within` would be a solution for this specific problem. [0] https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1210 On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:55 PM Andy Goryachev <andy.goryac...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Michael: > > > > Is there a specific problem that absolutely cannot be solved without adding > extra properties to Node (or Control)? > > > > Thanks! > > -andy
