On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:54:51 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Note that we need to use the base bug ID for backports that were first >>> fixed in jfx21 >> >> Can you shed some light on this for future reference? >> >> In case of [JDK-8313324](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313324), we do >> not use the base bug id. The same was also applied to jfx21.0.1, should we >> be using [JDK-8313331](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313331) or the >> base bug id for 21.0.1 release notes? > > We should _always_ use the base bug ID and _never_ the backport ID, which for > this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227). > > I will look into adjusting the JBS filter to make this a less error-prone > process (using the `masterbug` macro which will provide the base bug IDs for > a given set of backports). > We should always use the base bug ID and never the backport ID, which for > this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227). And to be clear I meant that the "base bug ID" for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1239#discussion_r1324409266
