On Mon, 13 May 2024 15:54:47 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> tests/system/src/test/.classpath line 17:
>> 
>>> 15:                 <attributes>
>>> 16:                         <attribute name="module" value="true"/>
>>> 17:                         <attribute name="add-exports" 
>>> value="javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui.monocle=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.sg.prism=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.impl=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.image.impl=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.events=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.css=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.geom=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui.mac=ALL-UNNAMED:javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui.win=ALL-UNNAMED"/>
>> 
>> I wonder if we should just copy this attribute from the master branch, to 
>> avoid future conflicts?
>
> Probably not as part of this backport. Also, the fact that they are different 
> suggests that there might be another fix that is in mainline but not in 
> jfx22u (and we wouldn't choose to backport another fix just to avoid a merge 
> conflict).

forgot to mention the diff is just a different ordering.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx22u/pull/28#discussion_r1598760279

Reply via email to