On Wed, 15 May 2024 22:13:34 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> or is it? :-) >> >>  >> >> Looks to me like it is... > > A passing GHA test run is neither necessary nor sufficient. It is an > interesting data point. A PR can be integrated with a failing run as long as > we understand why it failed. It is something for a reviewer to check and ask > about if they suspect it points to a real problem. I'll reword this a little > bit to make it clear. I'm sort of glad that GitHub / Azure chose today to > break it. It is a great illustration of why we don't want it to be blocking. > > Btw, I filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332328 to track the GHA > failure. I updated the wording slightly ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1455#discussion_r1605062114
