On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:31:58 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> On closer inspection, I don't think this should be removed as part of PR >> #1569, since that file is already using JUnit 5 and is not touched by your >> PR. >> >> Either I can remove the method with this PR or we just leave it for a >> follow-up. Removing it with this PR seems easiest, since I am already >> modifying that method as part of this PR (along with other methods that >> catch and ignore InterruptedException from sleep). > > I agree with removing the method in this PR. Thanks! Done. Thanks. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1575#discussion_r1769017784
