On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:36:11 GMT, John Hendrikx <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think these rules need to become part of the specification of
> `ChangeListener`.
If we do that, then we
1. break many implementations that don't use the property base classes ("break"
as in: render them non-compliant)
2. force compliant implementations to basically re-implement this PR, which is
unreasonable
We should think about providing a listener management API that third parties
can use to easily create compliant implementations.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1081#issuecomment-2673238902
