On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:24:03 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is similar (but not quite the same) to the case of a bug that was 
>> introduced and fixed in the same release, which we exclude with the 
>> rationale that the end user or app developer who updates from one release to 
>> the next never sees the interim state. I can see a case for excluding these 
>> two third-party updates using the same reasoning.
>> 
>> What do others think? @hjohn @johanvos @andy-goryachev-oracle ?
>
> I am in favor of keeping intermediary revisions for the same reason 
> @kevinrushforth mentioned, and also because it eliminates manual filtering 
> (?) and associated mistakes.

I would say they're not needed.  It could be confusing I suppose (you may at 
first glance think GStreamer is now version 1.24.6)  On the other hand, I can 
understand wanting to list all the JDK issues that were involved in a release.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1712#discussion_r1990106526

Reply via email to