On Tue, 6 May 2025 18:45:47 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Maybe a `volatile` would be a better choice then? > > `volatile` is not enough, because the different values are correlated (for > example `foreground`, `background`, and `colorScheme`). All values need to be > updated in a single transaction, as otherwise we could end up reading a > transient combination of values. I see. The I suggest we enforce single-threaded nature of it: everything must happen in the FX Application Thread. I don't think it's a good idea to start synchronizing things in FX now all of a sudden. Any code that wants to access FX from a background thread must do so using a combination of `runLater` and a `CountDownLatch`. What do you think? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1655#discussion_r2076069191
