On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 13:56:05 GMT, Marius Hanl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently, the VirtualFlowTestUtils used ONLY for tests has many utility
> methods to get and do something with the VirtualFlow of Virtualized Controls.
>
> It has one flaw: It may creates a temporary Stage with the StageLoader, when
> the Control was never inside a Scene (and Stage) yet. This is done to get the
> VirtualFlow, which is not possible otherwise.
>
> Take the following test code:
>
> VirtualFlowTestUtils.clickOnRow(tableView, 2);
> VirtualFlowTestUtils.clickOnRow(tableView, 4);
>
>
> What it does it to create a Stage for the first method and dispose it after.
> And create another Stage for the second method and dispose it after.
>
> This does not test a realistic scenario and the chance is quite high that
> developers used that methods without even knowing that it contains such logic.
>
> So the idea is to remove the StageLoader code from VirtualFlowTestUtils and
> rather use it in the Test code before calling the Util methods.
>
> For the example above, this would result in:
>
> stageLoader = new StageLoader(tableView);
> VirtualFlowTestUtils.clickOnRow(tableView, 2);
> VirtualFlowTestUtils.clickOnRow(tableView, 4);
>
>
> The stageLoader should be disposed in an @AfterEach.
>
> Note: Nearly all touched tests are indeed much older test code. New tests are
> not affected and already use it correcty.
> Sometimes a call to `Toolkit.getToolkit().firePulse();` was needed.
> Previously, creating a new Stage for every call to the util methods did that
> implicitly.
It's a trivial change, but I wonder if 2 reviewers are needed.
modules/javafx.controls/src/test/java/test/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/infrastructure/VirtualFlowTestUtils.java
line 349:
> 347: flow = (VirtualFlow<?>)control.lookup("#virtual-flow");
> 348:
> 349: if (sl != null) {
should we have a check here with a helpful message (which recommends to use
`StageLoader`), instead of returning `null`?
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1829#pullrequestreview-2932969739
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1829#discussion_r2150529464
