On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 20:56:56 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Have alternatives been discussed? > > Yes, internally. This PR has been out for quite a while, too. Okay... the OpenJFX project states in CONTRIBUTING.md, section "New features / API additions": _Discuss the proposed feature on the [openjfx-dev](https://mail.openjdk.org/mailman/listinfo/openjfx-dev) mailing list._ I'm not sure how "internal" discussions qualify. Oracle is not the only stakeholder in this project. > The priority here is not to break the existing applications that might have > coded a workaround. My question was whether this is an educated guess, or whether this problem is corroborated by data. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1817#issuecomment-3046533056
