Hi OpenJFX 🙂 I am a 57 years old IT Teacher, I am learning Java and JavaFX, as I have some doubts I requested to enter to your distribution list, so I could ask my doubts, but I am receiving many emails everyday and I could see that all of you are experts programming with JavaFX ;)
I think I should look for a different way to ask my biginner doubts, that´s why I am respectfully asking you to delete my name from your distribution list. It was a pleasure to read you for few days, I would like to have more time to study much more about JavaFX so I could become an expert like you, for sure I'll do that in the future ;) Thanks in advance for your kind attention, have a nice afternoon 🙂 Master Ma. Bárbara Salinas Luna Profesora de planta Departamento de Ciencias Preparatoria Esmeralda Campus Estado de México Tecnológico de Monterrey Tel. +55 5864 5370 [email protected] ________________________________ From: openjfx-dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Andy Goryachev <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 4:36 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: RFR: 8366201: RichTextArea: remove allowUndo parameter [v6] On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 17:39:18 GMT, Andy Goryachev <[email protected]> wrote: >> Original user feedback (see >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openjdk.org%2Fpipermail%2Fopenjfx-discuss%2F2025-August%2F000267.html&data=05%7C02%7Cbarbara.salinas%40tec.mx%7C8692f3db4ee14304fffa08de18052523%7Cc65a3ea60f7c400b89345a6dc1705645%7C0%7C0%7C638974607546251784%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=K0ZSjEG9KQdMhNSRzSFl7TlZZbW8RK8IgmLMF%2F%2BW%2FCA%3D&reserved=0<https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-discuss/2025-August/000267.html> >> ) called for adding an `allowUndo` parameter to `applyStyle()` and >> `setStyle()` methods similarly to `replaceText()`. >> >> Upon further analysis, the `allowUndo` parameter was a mistake: allowing the >> application code to disable creating undo/redo entries messes up the >> internal undo/redo stack. >> There is an internal need (`UndoableChange`), but it should not be exposed >> via public API. >> >> This PR also adds `isUndoRedoEnabled()` and `setUndoRedoEnabled()` to the >> `StyledTextModel`, as well as its forwarding aliases to `RichTextArea` to >> allow for the application to disable undo/redo temporarily, for example, >> when building a document from multiple segments. >> >> WARNING this is an incompatible change, permitted because of the incubator. >> >> There remains a possible issue with currently unlimited size of the >> undo/redo stack - perhaps we should limit its depth to maybe 100-200 >> entries, see >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.openjdk.org%2Fbrowse%2FJDK-8370447&data=05%7C02%7Cbarbara.salinas%40tec.mx%7C8692f3db4ee14304fffa08de18052523%7Cc65a3ea60f7c400b89345a6dc1705645%7C0%7C0%7C638974607546282964%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6rmGP4bqJqO%2FyImDQKAYI7ARDdGzUg3tXt%2FzX6xepYc%3D&reserved=0<https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8370447> >> . > > Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > javadoc I wonder if it might be better to remove these notes from all the editing methods in the control (since all of them call the model), and keep the notes in the model. ------------- PR Comment: https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.openjdk.org%2Fjfx%2Fpull%2F1941%23issuecomment-3470491866&data=05%7C02%7Cbarbara.salinas%40tec.mx%7C8692f3db4ee14304fffa08de18052523%7Cc65a3ea60f7c400b89345a6dc1705645%7C0%7C0%7C638974607546302303%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MwGMq%2B6BvrjHXOMQvxh6bCKPhnvB5SUN2k%2FHymQVo6A%3D&reserved=0<https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1941#issuecomment-3470491866>
