On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:47:45 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
> This PR bumps the minimum version of the JDK needed to run JavaFX to JDK 25. > > In order for JavaFX to be able to use more recent JDK features, we should > increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. > Additionally, there is an ongoing cost to keeping JavaFX buildable and > runnable on older versions of Java, and little reason to continue to do so. > > This continues our current practice of setting the minimum JDK for JavaFX N > to JDK N-2. JavaFX N is primarily intended for use with JDK N and we also > build and test it against JDK N-1 (which is typically what we use as the boot > JDK). Anything older than that, including the proposed minimum JDK N-2 (25 in > this specific case), is untested. > > This PR targeted to master for JavaFX 27, and must not be backported to any > earlier version. This needs a CSR and a release note. build.properties line 93: > 91: jfx.build.jdk.version=25.0.1 > 92: jfx.build.jdk.buildnum=8 > 93: jfx.build.jdk.version.min=25 is `jfx.build.jdk.buildnum.min` correct or is it too early to update? build.properties line 98: > 96: > 97: # The jfx.gradle.version property defines the version of gradle that is > 98: # used in the build. It must match the version number in I assume the gradle version remains the same? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2056#discussion_r2737845572 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2056#discussion_r2737847524
