On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:52:04 GMT, Laurent Bourgès <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   made Helpers.ulp public to fix compilation
>
>> I came up with what I think is an equivalent of the Main.java in 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341381
>> 
>> I noticed that the shapes do not correspond to the GIF in the ticket - the 
>> curves in the bug form a text outline, whereas the GIF shows something else. 
>> Not sure if important.
>> 
>> What's important is that I cannot reproduce the issue with the latest master 
>> branch.
>> 
>> Please use the latest monkey tester from 
>> https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/MonkeyTest
>> 
>> select the Shape page and set the properties according to the screenshot: 
>> <img alt="Screenshot 2026-01-16 at 09 27 59" width="1145" height="866" 
>> src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/107069028/536927849-2a177f43-a1ca-4c11-8a8d-57fe7dfcb4a5.png?jwt=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3Njg1ODk0ODgsIm5iZiI6MTc2ODU4OTE4OCwicGF0aCI6Ii8xMDcwNjkwMjgvNTM2OTI3ODQ5LTJhMTc3ZjQzLWExY2EtNGMxMS04YThkLTU3ZmU3ZGZjYjRhNS5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjYwMTE2JTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI2MDExNlQxODQ2MjhaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT0zNzYzYzcxNTdjNmFhZWJlYmE5MGU0MWVjYTA0MWM5MmM4NDkxZmY0NDdkZGVmYjMzOTQ5OTUxNTI1MGYwNGQ5JlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCJ9.gXJg8ARqE1-rcBqXTYakaLpm41v6ZtxpByfqXQQfKYA";>
>> 
>> Here is the reproducer part of the code: 
>> https://github.com/andy-goryachev-oracle/MonkeyTest/blob/b19d640533b89068644426dcf6aa7f137b4d4334/src/com/oracle/tools/fx/monkey/pages/ShapePage.java#L213
>> 
>> What am I doing wrong, @bourgesl ?
> 
> I will try reproducing this weird scale or extract transformed values to make 
> bad cubics

@bourgesl would be nice to see this PR reopen once a good test case is found

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2039#issuecomment-4069258937

Reply via email to