On Tue, 26 May 2026 21:48:27 GMT, Marius Hanl <[email protected]> wrote:

> This replaces all `JNI_VERSION` version strings with `JNI_VERSION_1_8`.
> All of JavaFX is `JNI_VERSION_1_8` now.
> 
> - Tested with JLink+JPackage (with and without JMods)
> - Tested with GraalVM (newest version 25)
> 
> Sometimes this allowed to replace code that was always built like this:
> 
> 
> #ifdef JNI_VERSION_1_8
>     //min. returned JNI_VERSION required by JDK8 for builtin libraries
>     JNIEnv *env;
>     if ((*vm)->GetEnv(vm, (void **)&env, JNI_VERSION_1_8) != JNI_OK) {
>         return JNI_VERSION_1_4;
>     }
>    ...
> 
> 
> with:
> 
> return JNI_VERSION_1_8;
> 
> 
> **Question -> Will do as Follow-up** 
> 
> ~There are a few locations where we have the following pattern;~
> 
>     if (jvm->GetEnv((void **)&env, JNI_VERSION_1_8)) {
>         return JNI_ERR; /* JNI version not supported */
>     }
> 
> ~which should not happen anymore, right? 
> Most of the code locations do not have this check and just do:~
> 
> jvm->GetEnv(&env, JNI_VERSION_1_8);
> 
> ~Should I follow that pattern for the few locations left?~
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Will create a follow-up task and assign it to me - so we can make this change 
first, which should be uncontroversial, and then I'll implement the `env` 
simplification and write in the mailing list again. Especially regarding the 
Android and Web env changes, I'd at least prefer to make sure this is fine for 
Gluon as well.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2175#issuecomment-4615114439

Reply via email to