On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:35:32 GMT, Christopher Schnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is a much simpler fix for JDK-8384806 which does not have any side >> effects. >> >> This restores the old code with only a one line change instead. For >> reference, see >> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/8d917ae738120e12ac12cd0957879b7c00e59b03. >> We now fix the issue by clearing the cell with >> `buttonCell.updateIndex(-1);` as using `buttonCell.setItem(null);` was >> causing the original issue when the item was already null. >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Christopher Schnick has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Update comment @crschnick Your change (at version f9e19ea475e4b5713667666a58d69c0fd8e4444d) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2179#issuecomment-4681774610
