On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:30:43 GMT, Jurgen <[email protected]> wrote:

>> # Support for Embedded Images, Text Highlights, Wavy Underlines
>> 
>> ## Summary
>> 
>> This PR adds new attributes to support embedded images, text highlights, and 
>> wavy underlines.
>> 
>> The `RichEditorDemoApp` gains new context menus and enables drag and drop to 
>> showcase the new functionality.
>> 
>> <img width="768" height="703" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-18 at 12 40 28" 
>> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/678bdbac-6582-46ee-bd41-ea938df930bb";
>>  />
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ## Problem
>> 
>> Among the feedback received after publishing the RichTextArea incubating 
>> module, a number of users complained about the need to support embedded 
>> images.  Other users complained about difficulty to get the text highlighted 
>> or wavy underlined, and having these decorations controlled via CSS.
>> 
>> 
>> ## Solution
>> 
>> Support for images was intentionally missing in the initial release; this PR 
>> adds the feature.
>> 
>> Adding highlights and underlines is a bit more complicated, for several 
>> reasons.  One reason is that the existing highlighting mechanism supports 
>> mixing of arbitrary number of translucent colors - something that is pretty 
>> much impossible to do with CSS alone.
>> 
>> A useful compromise is to offer a limited number of standard attributes that 
>> can be controlled via CSS: 5 highlights and 3 wavy underlines.
>> 
>> 
>> ## Specification
>> 
>> 
>> ### StyleAttributeMap Attributes
>> 
>> New attributes:
>> - EMBEDDED_IMAGE
>> - TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_1 ... TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_5
>> - UNDERLINE_WAVY_1 ... UNDERLINE_WAVY_3
>> 
>> ### CSS Styling
>> 
>> The styling of highlights and wavy underlines is determined by the 
>> stylesheet and can be changed by the user.
>> 
>> The style selectors are:
>> 
>> `.rich-text-area .text-highlight-1` ... `.rich-text-area .text-highlight-5`
>> `.rich-text-area .underline-wavy-1` ... `.rich-text-area .underline-wavy-3`
>> 
>> 
>> ### New Public APIs
>> 
>> `EmbeddedImage`
>> `FileListFormatHandler`
>> `StyleAttribute.inlineNode()`
>> `StyleAttribute.isInlineNode()`
>> `StyledSegment.ofInlineNode()`
>> `CellContext.RunDecor`
>> `CellContext.decorateRun()`
>> `RichTextArea.dropTargetProperty`
>> `RichTextArea.clearDropTarget()`
>> `RichTextArea.getStyleAttributeMap()`
>> 
>> 
>> ### File Format Changes
>> 
>> The data transfer format (also used by the demo app to save the .rich files) 
>> version string is changed, making the old files unreadable.
>> 
>> Perhaps it should remain unchanged for the duration of the incubation 
>> period.  See also [2]
>> 
>> 
>> ### Breaking API Changes
>> 
>> `DataFormatHandler.createStyl...
>
> modules/jfx.incubator.richtext/src/main/java/jfx/incubator/scene/control/richtext/RichTextArea.java
>  line 2529:
> 
>> 2527:             if (v) {
>> 2528:                 cx.decorateRun(StyleAttributeMap.TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_1, 
>> CellContext.RunDecor.HIGHLIGHT, Params.TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_1);
>> 2529:             }
> 
> Since a developer could define their own highlight or wavy underline 
> attribute like:
>> INFO_HIGHLIGHT = new StyleAttribute<>( "INFO_HIGHLIGHT", Color.class, false 
>> );
> 
> and want to add it to the _StyleHandlerRegistry_, it would be helpful if 
> `decorateRun` was overloaded with a Color parameter:
>> cx.decorateRun( INFO_HIGHLIGHT, CellContext.RunDecor.HIGHLIGHT, v );

+1

> modules/jfx.incubator.richtext/src/main/java/jfx/incubator/scene/control/richtext/model/StyleAttributeMap.java
>  line 131:
> 
>> 129:      * @since 27
>> 130:      */
>> 131:     public static final StyleAttribute<Boolean> TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_5 = 
>> StyleAttribute.character("TEXT_HIGHLIGHT_5", Boolean.class);
> 
> The JavaDoc comments here should mention that the color is specified via CSS 
> and what the default color is.
> Something like: "Text highlight attribute. The color is specified via CSS 
> text-highlight-1 which has a default color of xxxx."

this is a good idea, thanks!

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2196#discussion_r3468702837
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2196#discussion_r3468692744

Reply via email to