On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:04:21 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given that we are T-47 hours to the JavaFX 27 RDP1 fork, I think we are > better off backing out JDK-8268657 for 27, and then redoing it, along with > _this_ fix in JavaFX 28 when we we will have the time to do more evaluation > and testing to catch regressions before they happen, and more time to deal > with any regressions that might be missed. > > What do other reviewers think? I thought about this today as well and also came to the same conclusion. So lets revert it. In my profiling, this PR caused an increase in calls to `getCachedFont`, which I don't like but I haven't yet found a better way to deal with this without giving up the cached styleable ancestor. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2210#issuecomment-4973218298
