On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:05:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Speaking of the release notes, would it make sense to have a separate >> section that talks about android/iOS specifics, or you would rather not? > >> I don't think the question about whether or not tested by O. is relevant. > > You're right, it isn't relevant (and my answer ignored that specific part of > Andy's question). > >> Apart from that, I don't have a strong opinion. On one hand, I think it is >> relevant to indicate that there is ongoing work for platforms that are not >> in mainstream releases. On the other hand, I don't want to give the >> impression that JavaFX for iOS runs out of the box. > > Yes, this is the question. > >> My main reason for including it is that I think we don't want too many rules >> about what issues are not in the release notes. Unless there are excellent >> reasons that can easily be justified without much discussion, it seems >> better to me to have the issues that come out of the filter you and I use in >> the release notes. > > I wasn't suggesting to add more rules. Rather the question is "should we add > `javafx-rn-exclude` label to explicitly exclude them" like I do for other > issues that don't make sense for the release notes. > > Currently they are not excluded which is why they are in this PR. I'm OK > either way, but since iOS releases really are separate, it's worth asking the > question. > Question - would it make sense to configure the github actions to build on > those platforms so we'll have an advance warning when we break things? Not possible. There is no such thing. That's my point about this not just being a separate platform. > Speaking of the release notes, would it make sense to have a separate section > that talks about android/iOS specifics, or you would rather not? No, I'd rather not. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2256#discussion_r3897072096
