On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:11 AM, ext Roald de Wit wrote: > Hi, > > Identity theft is a matter of concern these days. Wouldn't making people's > signatures publicly available add to this?
This is the reason that CLAs are not in SVN: both signatures (where they are provided) and addresses seemed like information that we would be better off not publishing. I don't have a better suggestion right now, but that was the original reason. -- Chris > Regards, Roald > > On 07/12/10 04:51, Tim Schaub wrote: >> I think it would make sense to maintain digital copies of contributor >> agreements in our repository. The record keeping process is a bit opaque to >> me at this point, and I think it would benefit us in the future to have a >> more accessible place for these documents. I assume we forward signed >> copies to OSGeo, but maintaining them next to the code makes sense to me as >> well. >> >> Going forward, would others be in favor of maintaining digital copies of >> CLAs in subversion? >> >> Tim >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > d...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list d...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
