>>>> 2/ in test 4, if you remove the initialize function from B and >>>> overload >>>> A, >>>> the B constructor is still the previous A's constructor. >>> >>> Yes. To address this one I see no other solution than patching >>> OpenLayers.Class. See the patch attached to this email, and my >>> test_overload_5 test function. The Class.html tests continue to pass >>> with my patch. >>> >> >> this works in OL 2.11, not in OL 2.10 for me !-( >> I guess there is something similar to do in OL 2.10 ? > > Your initial mail was about OpenLayers trunk/2.11 introducing > regressions. Now the failing test that remains is OL 2.10-only, so OL > trunk/2.11 works better than OL 2.10 for you. Yippee! :-) >
My initial mail was really about regression between 2.10 and 2.11 !-) > (Not sure it is worth "fixing" OL 2.10 for that.) > Well, one of my test is versus the current release (2.10) and I am sure there are users that will migrate slower than us (I mean OL and IGNF) ... I do think it is worth fixing it ... at least to prove there is no regression !-D Regards, didier > -- > Eric Lemoine > > Camptocamp France SAS > Savoie Technolac, BP 352 > 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex > > Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 > Mail : eric.lemo...@camptocamp.com > http://www.camptocamp.com > -- RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail 2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23 _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list d...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
