Hi, no worries, everybody's out there, busy improving OpenLayers. Using the new Class.js file with older versions of OpenLayers shouldn't be a problem. An update to latest OpenLayers would be the best option of course, so you get the latest and greatest.
Andreas. On Aug 10, 2011, at 16:31 , myOpenLayersUName wrote: > The problem seems to be how the Class.js class is defined in the release > versions of OpenLayers. > > If I replace the BaseTypes/Class.js in OpenLayers 2.8 and/or 2.10 with the > BaseTypes/Class.js distributed with 2.11, I am able to override the > OpenLayers.Protocol.WFS.v1 as expected. > > Is anyone (assuming there is anyone out there, which at this point I'm > really not sure is the case) aware of any bad implications in our doing > this? So far I haven't seen any, but I haven't done any major testing with > this change yet either? > > Cheers, > jtm > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/How-to-override-abstract-OpenLayers-Protocol-WFS-v1-tp6534072p6672601.html > Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > d...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev -- Andreas Hocevar OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list d...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
