Hi Eric,

I agree on 3475, but the reopening of 3419 does not deal with the 2.11 branch 
does it (there is not even a BackBufferable.js in the 2.11 branch)?

http://svn.openlayers.org/branches/openlayers/2.11/lib/OpenLayers/Tile/

Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS - http://osgis.nl

On Aug 29, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Eric Lemoine wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:33 PM,  <christopher.schm...@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'd like to put forward a motion to release the current OL 2.11 RC3 as the 
>> final
>> OL 2.11 release unless we hear any showstopping regressions by Wednesday 
>> morning.
>> 
>> If anyone has any reason not to do this, speak now or forever hold your 
>> peace :)
> 
> Hi
> 
> #3419 got reopened, and it looks there's a regression there. I'm also
> concerned with #3475.
> 
> <http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3419>
> <http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3475>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Eric Lemoine
> 
> Camptocamp France SAS
> Savoie Technolac, BP 352
> 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex
> 
> Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
> Mail : eric.lemo...@camptocamp.com
> http://www.camptocamp.com
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> d...@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
d...@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

Reply via email to