Oh, I had to add one small patch to WPSExecute, to be able to deal with
GML input data, without that, the test page does not work
http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3517
Jachym
On 24.9.2011 03:18, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Hi,
having more closer look at the WPSExecute format, it basically contains
*very good* support for Execute requests formating as well. So
basically, you can ignore my previous email.
I have written some test page, based on data from the WPS Shootout [1],
results are very promising:
So far, tested only Deegree, 52North, Geoserver and Zoo (I know their
public address), PyWPS (I have it on localhost, public server does not
work now).
Results:
========
GetCapabilities: all passed
DescribeProcess (buffer): all passed
Execute (gml 3.1 input):
pywps and zoo did well,
geoserver returned correct exception (expecting Geometry, not
Feature),
52North and Deergree failed (Error 500)
I think, that is great result!
We will continue the discussion at wps-dev mailing list, I just wanted,
that the openlayers community is informed about this test.
Sample test page attached (just copy to examples/ directory)
As I already said: the OpenLayers.Format.WPS* stuff seems to be pretty
good - you did very well job, thanks for it. I'm going to use it in the
Ext-based frontend, I'm supposed to do nowadays.
We can now drop support for pywps/WPS.js.
Jachym
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
d...@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
