Same here, this is a good idea. On 27 September 2011 08:17, Marc Jansen <jan...@terrestris.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am also +1 on having "-deprecated" files whereever possible. > > A simple but very good idea, both for having smaller builds and > educating users to change client code to be independant of deprecated code. > > Best regards, > Marc > > > On 25.09.2011 13:38, Xavier Mamano (jorix) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In OL exists code labeled as *Deprecated* but it is not possible to >> exclude deprecated code in compressed code, examples: "Util.js", >> "BaseTypes/Class.js", "BaseTypes/Element.js" ... >> >> If these source files are split into two, for example "Util.js" and >> "Util-deprecate.js" (with "@requires OpenLayers/Util.js"), so could easily >> create configuration files to exclude deprecated code. >> >> NOTE: In the far future the advanced optimization of "Closure Compiler" >> can also help, but not in the medium term. >> >> Xavier Mamano >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OL-build-Why-put-in-the-code-compressed-code-deprecated-tp6828967p6828967.html >> Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> d...@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > d...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev >
-- Bruno Binet Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex Mail : bruno.bi...@camptocamp.com http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list d...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
