Hi Andreas,
What Phil meant is that you should switch to a WMS server returning
an image to display your all your features, and if you need to query or
manipulate them use WFS but only with a small number of features at a time.
HTH,
Alexandre
On 12-09-26 06:33 AM, Andreas Schnieders wrote:
Hi,
>> to those of you being experienced with large numbers of features: What
>> do you consider the fastest way to create something around 1000
>> features and update the every 5 - 60 seconds? Or is there even an
>> "official" best practice?
>Large no. of features and KML dont go well together in my opinion. I
>would strongly consider using WMS for image, WFS for any query. You
>might want to see how well your application fits WMS-T.
Thanks! But where exactly would be the benefit of switching from KML
to GML3 for example? GML is "just" another xml-structure OpenLayers
would have to evaluate...?
Or would you recommend switching to JSON-output for WFS? How would you
create the features on client-side in that case?
Kind regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-users
--
Alexandre Dubé
Mapgears
www.mapgears.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-users
