On 22. juli 2015 17:54, Howard Chu wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> If we require C99 library features like this, then I >> think we should add a configure test for them. Strange >> breakage at runtime is rather worse than a failed build. >> >> (That's not the same as testing for a C99 compiler, since >> one can have a C99 compiler like gcc with a C90 library.) > > The fewer configure tests we need, the better. Happy to replace %zu with %llu > and forget about it. It's not worth a fuss.
Right. Looks like it should be %ld and (long) though, we don't use long long either except inside HAVE_LONG_LONG etc and mdb.c -- Hallvard
