On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> wrote: > --On Saturday, January 23, 2016 2:43 PM +0000 [email protected] wrote: > >> Thanks, >> >> Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon >> check rather than init later). >> >> I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop >> instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold >> as the list modification. >> >> Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday > > > Hi Tom, > > Are you able to confirm if the fix is good? I'm working on 2.4.44, and want > to be sure this fix is included.
I'v had an instance running with this patch for a few days, no SEGV, looks good to me. Thanks > > Thanks! > > --Quanah > > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Platform Architect > Zimbra, Inc. > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
