https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282
--- Comment #9 from Howard Chu <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #7) > (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #6) > > - a SID is added to the set by the provider, like here. This could be due to > > a delete (like here) and that delete has to be replicated - that is the > > point of running syncrepl_del_nonpresent > > Yes, the problem that was being addressed is that if the local node knows > about more SIDs than the remote node, then the incoming present list from > the remote node can't be trusted. Doing a del_nonpresent could delete a lot > of entries that the remote node doesn't know about, but exist legitimately > on the local node. More on this, from https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470#c15 We could try changing del_nonpresent to ignore entries with entryCSN newer than the current remote cookie, instead of ignoring the entire presentlist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
